PITCHER MATCHUP

Mason Englert vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mason Englert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mason Englert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Changeup 30%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sinker 17%Cutter 15%Curveball 12%Slider 3%Unknown 2%SV 1%CS 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mason Englert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-23 game page →