PITCHER MATCHUP

Mason Barnett vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mason Barnett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mason Barnett's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .330vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 19%Slider 14%Curveball 14%Changeup 6%Unknown 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mason Barnett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Byron Buxton RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RL Royce Lewis RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 VC Victor Caratini SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.