PITCHER MATCHUP

Mason Adams vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mason Adams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mason Adams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Sinker 25%Curveball 19%Sweeper 13%Cutter 6%Changeup 5%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mason Adams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .441 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.