PITCHER MATCHUP

Mason Adams vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mason Adams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mason Adams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Sinker 25%Curveball 19%Sweeper 13%Cutter 6%Changeup 5%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mason Adams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.