PITCHER MATCHUP

Mason Adams vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mason Adams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mason Adams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .377vs RHH xwOBA .350Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sinker 26%Curveball 18%Sweeper 13%Changeup 5%Cutter 5%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mason Adams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 648 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 602 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-23 game page →