PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Changeup 30%Cutter 23%Curveball 9%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.