PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .349Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 28%Cutter 24%Curveball 9%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 EQ Edgar Quero SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.