PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 32%Changeup 29%Cutter 24%Curveball 10%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TP Tristan Peters LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 EQ Edgar Quero SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.