PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Changeup 29%Cutter 23%Curveball 9%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.