PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Changeup 29%Cutter 23%Curveball 9%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.