PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 32%Changeup 29%Cutter 24%Curveball 10%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 608 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-18 game page →