PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .349Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 28%Cutter 24%Curveball 9%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 646 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DS Daniel Susac RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR Jesus Rodriguez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesus Rodriguez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 1 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.