PITCHER MATCHUP

Martín Pérez vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Martín Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Martín Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .345Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 29%Cutter 24%Curveball 9%Four-Seam Fastball 5%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Martín Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.