PITCHER MATCHUP

MacKenzie Gore vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against MacKenzie Gore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

MacKenzie Gore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024

Four-Seam Fastball 49%Curveball 21%Changeup 11%Slider 9%Cutter 7%Sinker 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against MacKenzie Gore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314

1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .314
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .353
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .319
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
4 CK Christian Koss RHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .299
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .302
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .314
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .311
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
9 TH Turner Hill LHB .315
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.

Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.