PITCHER MATCHUP

MacKenzie Gore vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against MacKenzie Gore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

MacKenzie Gore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Curveball 22%Changeup 11%Slider 9%Cutter 8%Sinker 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against MacKenzie Gore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 585 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DS Daniel Susac RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CK Christian Koss RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-04 game page →