PITCHER MATCHUP
MacKenzie Gore vs Athletics
How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against MacKenzie Gore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.
MacKenzie Gore's arsenal
Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Curveball 21%Changeup 11%Slider 9%Cutter 7%Sinker 3%
How the Athletics's regulars project
Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against MacKenzie Gore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.
Lineup avg xwOBA .309
-
1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .311
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .330
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .322
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .300
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 JH Jonah Heim SH .289
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .307
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .308
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 AW Alika Williams RHB .296
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alika Williams
- Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.