PITCHER MATCHUP

MacKenzie Gore vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against MacKenzie Gore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

MacKenzie Gore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .330vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Curveball 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Cutter 8%Sinker 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against MacKenzie Gore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Jorge Soler RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-08 game page →