PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 645 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CR Ceddanne Rafaela RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ceddanne Rafaela
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willson Contreras RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willson Contreras
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AR Adley Rutschman SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CM Curtis Mead RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MY Masataka Yoshida LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masataka Yoshida
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.