PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 654 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JJ Josh Jung RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 EC Evan Carter LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.