PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.