PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .312vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Cutter 9%Four-Seam Fastball 9%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-03 game page →