PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .219 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.