PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Changeup 26%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Cutter 9%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JC Jackson Chourio SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-29 game page →