PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .312vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 567 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.