PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .312vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Cutter 9%Four-Seam Fastball 9%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 625 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LT Lane Thomas RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .439 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.