PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MS Myles Straw RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.