PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .304vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Cutter 9%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .300
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 GS George Springer RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MS Myles Straw RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.