PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .301
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.