PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 10%Cutter 9%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .301
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.