PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Webb vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Webb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Webb's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Changeup 26%Sweeper 23%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Cutter 9%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Webb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .302
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-24 game page →