PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 30%Splitter 16%Curveball 8%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%Sinker 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .417 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 492 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 486 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-13 game page →