PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .277vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 30%Splitter 16%Curveball 9%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%Sinker 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-01 game page →