PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 29%Splitter 16%Curveball 7%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%Sinker 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .276
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.