PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .277vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 30%Splitter 16%Curveball 9%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%Sinker 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JJ Josh Jung RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-26 game page →