PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 29%Splitter 16%Curveball 7%Cutter 4%Changeup 4%Sweeper 1%Sinker 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.