PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Slider 30%Splitter 16%Curveball 9%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%Sinker 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .301
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PB Patrick Bailey SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DF David Fry SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Fry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AH Austin Hedges RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Hedges
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-27 game page →