PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .282vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 29%Splitter 16%Curveball 8%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%Sinker 1%Sweeper 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 606 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.