PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Gilbert vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Gilbert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Gilbert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 29%Splitter 16%Curveball 7%Cutter 4%Changeup 4%Sweeper 1%Sinker 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Gilbert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.