PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Allen vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Allen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Allen's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .341Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 22%Changeup 18%Sinker 14%Cutter 13%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Allen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.