PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 555 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .219 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.