PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 KK Kyle Karros RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CC Cole Carrigg SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CN Connor Norby RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.