PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .319vs RHH xwOBA .280Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 31%Changeup 19%Cutter 10%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.