PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.