PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 547 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JT Jared Triolo RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HD Henry Davis RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 EV Esmerlyn Valdez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Esmerlyn Valdez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-02 game page →