PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 672 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.