PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .326vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 31%Changeup 19%Cutter 10%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 473 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SK Steven Kwan LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JR José Ramírez SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 541 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-20 game page →