PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .319vs RHH xwOBA .280Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 31%Changeup 19%Cutter 10%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 558 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.