PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Curveball 32%Changeup 18%Cutter 10%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .370
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-30 game page →