PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 JW Jordan Walker RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 AB Alec Burleson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NC Nathan Church LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JF José Fermín RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NG Nolan Gorman LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Gorman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 VS Victor Scott II LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Scott II
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BT Bryan Torres LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Torres
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-08 game page →