PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .280Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Curveball 31%Changeup 18%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC Jackson Chourio SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-28 game page →