PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 567 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.