PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .326vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Curveball 32%Changeup 17%Cutter 10%Four-Seam Fastball 2%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AR Austin Riley RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MH Michael Harris II LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DS Dominic Smith LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JM Jorge Mateo RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Mateo
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EW Eli White RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eli White
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-18 game page →