PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .280Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Curveball 31%Changeup 18%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 OA Ozzie Albies SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MO Matt Olson LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MH Michael Harris II LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DS Dominic Smith LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.