PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 662 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.