PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HB Henry Bolte RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MM Max Muncy RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.