PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 30%Changeup 19%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 4%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .300
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (4% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.