PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Curveball 31%Changeup 18%Cutter 11%Four-Seam Fastball 3%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .299
  1. 1 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HB Henry Bolte RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.