PITCHER MATCHUP

Landen Roupp vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Landen Roupp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Landen Roupp's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Curveball 32%Changeup 18%Cutter 10%Four-Seam Fastball 2%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Landen Roupp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MM Max Muncy RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (2% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-25 game page →