PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Hart vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Hart's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Hart's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .242vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025
Sweeper 30%Sinker 25%Slider 14%Splitter 13%Four-Seam Fastball 12%Changeup 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Hart, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 585 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CK Christian Koss RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.