PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Hart vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Hart's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Hart's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .248vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 28%Sweeper 28%Splitter 15%Slider 13%Four-Seam Fastball 12%Changeup 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Hart, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.