PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Hart vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Hart's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Hart's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .248vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 28%Sweeper 28%Splitter 15%Slider 13%Four-Seam Fastball 12%Changeup 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Hart, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 632 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AF Alex Freeland SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 WS Will Smith RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (12% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.