PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Harrison vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Harrison's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Harrison's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 57%SV 29%Changeup 11%Sinker 2%Cutter 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Harrison, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.