PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Harrison vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Harrison's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Harrison's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 57%SV 28%Changeup 11%Sinker 3%Cutter 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Harrison, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (57% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.