PITCHER MATCHUP
Kyle Freeland vs Pittsburgh Pirates
How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Freeland's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.
Kyle Freeland's arsenal
Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .361Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Knuckle Curve 24%Cutter 18%Sweeper 11%Changeup 10%Sinker 8%
How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project
Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Freeland, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.
Lineup avg xwOBA .318
-
1 BL Brandon Lowe SH .340
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
2 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .337
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .312
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .319
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
6 MO Marcell Ozuna RHB .335
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcell Ozuna
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 JM Jake Mangum SH .308
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
8 HD Henry Davis RHB .296
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 JT Jared Triolo RHB .298
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
- Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Knuckle Curve (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-19 game page →