PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Freeland vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Freeland's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Freeland's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .356Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Knuckle Curve 23%Cutter 19%Changeup 10%Sweeper 10%Sinker 10%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Freeland, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.