PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.