PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%Slider 27%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-20 game page →