PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.