PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.