PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%Slider 27%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WC Willi Castro SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-01 game page →