PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.