PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.