PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Slider 28%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Matt McLain RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TF TJ Friedl LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DM Dane Myers RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.