PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 657 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JP Joc Pederson LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.