PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.