PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 703 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .443 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.