PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .434 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.