PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .283Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Slider 28%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Bohm RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .425 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-02 game page →