PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .438 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.