PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .304vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 34%Slider 28%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .299
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.