PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 33%Slider 28%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .442 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (33% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →