PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Bradish vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Bradish's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Bradish's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 36%Slider 26%Curveball 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Bradish, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .444 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.