PITCHER MATCHUP

Kumar Rocker vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kumar Rocker's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kumar Rocker's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 29%Cutter 17%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Changeup 5%Curveball 2%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kumar Rocker, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.