PITCHER MATCHUP

Kumar Rocker vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kumar Rocker's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kumar Rocker's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .380vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 29%Sinker 29%Cutter 17%Four-Seam Fastball 15%Changeup 6%Curveball 3%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kumar Rocker, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CN Connor Norby RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JM Joe Mack LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-22 game page →