PITCHER MATCHUP

Kumar Rocker vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kumar Rocker's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kumar Rocker's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 29%Cutter 17%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Changeup 5%Curveball 2%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kumar Rocker, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.