PITCHER MATCHUP

Kumar Rocker vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kumar Rocker's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kumar Rocker's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 29%Cutter 17%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Changeup 5%Curveball 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kumar Rocker, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.